• News
  • Features
  • Literary Arts
  • Fringe Arts
  • Sports
  • Opinions
  • Letters
  • Special Issue
  • Comics
The Link

January 12, 2010 News

Coca-Cola lawyers threaten Cinema Politica

Claims upcoming film screenings violate confidentiality agreements

by Madeline Coleman

18n.CocaCola(vivien).jpg
GRAPHIC VIVIEN LEUNG

Concordia-based film collective Cinema Politica received a threatening letter on Jan. 11 from the lawyers for Coca-Cola stating that the network’s planned film tour for documentary The Coca-Cola Case violates a confidentiality agreement.

The film follows two American lawyers and union leaders as they attempt to bring a case against the soda pop giant for its alleged complicity in the murders of union leaders at Colombian bottling plants.

Cinema Politica founder Ezra Winton said the letter claimed the film was “defamatory” and included details of private negotiations between the company and the people who are the focus of the documentary.

Cinema Politica, in cooperation with the National Film Board of Canada, plans to screen The Coca-Cola Case at Cinema Politica locals, first stopping at Concordia on Jan. 18 before touring over 20 cities across the country and abroad.

“[The Coca-Cola Co.] knew about the film from the early days and I’m sure followed its progression. They probably thought that it would play at some film festivals then go away,” Winton told The Link after the legal letter was received on Jan. 11. “Now I think that [they’re contacting us because] it’s not just going away—that in fact it’s having a resurgence through our network.”

Filmmakers Carmen Garcia and Germán Gutiérrez said Coca-Cola and the film’s subjects had already settled prior claims of a breach of confidentiality. The company now requires information about where and when the documentary was filmed, but could not force the filmmakers to cut footage.

The company never contacted Garcia or Gutiérrez directly, choosing instead to level its criticism at the subjects of the documentary and Cinema Politica.

“The idea that you can take legal recourse against an exhibitor is pretty unheard of,” said Winton. “The film is already in the can. It’s already out in public with thousands of copies circulating. It’s with a national public production house. So [when their lawyer sent us that letter] it’s kind of just them going after the little guy because we’re grassroots.”

The lawyer who sent Winton the letter, Faith Gay of Quinn Emanuel Trial Lawyers in New York City, did not return The Link’s phone calls.

Winton said he felt Coca-Cola was concerned about the Cinema Politica screenings because they will mostly take place at university campuses, in full view of the youth and students who are the company’s target market. Coca-Cola routinely seeks—and gets—exclusivity contracts with universities and other institutions.

Students at schools including the University of Guelph have held successful campaigns to ban Coke from campuses, citing the company’s record of human rights abuses. Most recently, a Norwegian student association shut out Coke products from all universities and colleges across Norway.

Concordia currently has an exclusive contract with Pepsi Co.

Cinema Politica plans to go ahead with its Coca-Cola Case tour regardless.

“If the NFB or the filmmakers asked us to stop screening it we would,” explained Winton. “But lawyers that represent Coca-Cola that simply don’t agree with some of the representations in the film—with what the characters in the film say, not the filmmakers [themselves]—it’s as if they’re saying Coca-Cola is beyond any kind of criticism in a documentary film.

“Now they’re sending us this letter, which to me means we’re doing something right.”

Read The Link’s exclusive interview with filmmakers Carmen Garcia and Germán Gutiérrez on Corruption Classic.

  • Login to post comments
  • Contact Us
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Archive

Latest Issue

The Link Volume 30 Issue 25

User login

  • Request new password
Copyright 1980-2008 The Link. Site design and hosting by Fair Trade Media